Prediction of Hu Na vs Emiko Okagawa Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
H. Na vs E. Okagawa

Hu Na

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Emiko Okagawa

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Na 1 - 0 Okagawa

They have played 2 sets in total, with Hu Na winning 2 and Emiko Okagawa winning 0. The last match between Hu Na and Emiko Okagawa was at the Singapore, 23-04-1990, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Hu Na getting the victory 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Na	1
Okagawa	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Singapore(04-23-90)

Stats

Hu Na

Emiko Okagawa

H. Na vs E. Okagawa H2H Profile

H. Na	Stats	E. Okagawa
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.24% (96-121)	Career Total W/L	41.61% (62-87)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

H. Na vs E. Okagawa Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hu Na has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Emiko Okagawa has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hu Na, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emiko Okagawa has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Hu Na has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emiko Okagawa has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Hu Na has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Emiko Okagawa winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Hu Na has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 16/16), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 42/58). Emiko Okagawa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 14/18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 19/31).
Player level: In the last year, Hu Na has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Emiko Okagawa has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hu Na winning 1 times and Emiko Okagawa being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hu Na winning 2 and Emiko Okagawa winning 0.
The last match between Hu Na and Emiko Okagawa was at the Singapore, 23-04-1990, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Hu Na getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hu Na has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Emiko Okagawa has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hu Na has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emiko Okagawa has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Hu Na has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emiko Okagawa has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Hu Na vs Emiko Okagawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

H. Na vs E. Okagawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

H. Na	Stats	E. Okagawa
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

H. Na Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Key Biscayne - 15-03-1991
Q1 Kim SteinmetzK. Steinmetz	L	6-1 3-0 RET	Stats
Palm Springs - 25-02-1991
R2 Pam NelsonP. Nelson	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Manhattan Beach - 13-08-1990
Q1 Audra KellerA. Keller	L	4-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Albuquerque - 06-08-1990
R3 Karine QuentrecK. Quentrec	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Newport - 16-07-1990
R4 Anne SmithA. Smith	L	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

E. Okagawa Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei - 25-09-1992
R3 Maya KidowakiM. Kidowaki	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 13-01-1992
Q1 Nanne DahlmanN. Dahlman	L	6-2 2-6 6-0	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1991
Q1 Catherine SuireC. Suire	L	7-5 6-0	Stats
Pattaya - 15-04-1991
R3 Misumi MiyauchiM. Miyauchi	L	4-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 14-01-1991
Q2 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	L	5-7 6-4 9-7	Stats

View All

H. Na vs E. Okagawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

H. Na	Stats	E. Okagawa
44.24% (96/121)	YTD Win/Loss	41.61% (62/87)
45.01% (221/270)	Sets Win/Loss	44.08% (149/189)
48.61% (2183/2308)	Games Win/Loss	49.00% (1546/1609)
42.00% (42/58)	Hard Win/Loss	38.00% (19/31)
42.31% (11/15)	Clay Win/Loss	43.75% (14/18)
50.00% (12/12)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.25% (9/7)
50.00% (16/16)	Grass Win/Loss	38.46% (5/8)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
343.5	Average Opponent Rank	367.99
50.00% (1/1)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	50.00% (1/1)
44.44% (8/10)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (8/8)
42.42% (14/19)	Futures W/L	38.89% (14/22)
44% (94/215)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (61/148)
29% (2/7)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (4/9)
47% (28/60)	Deciding Set Win %	37% (15/41)
84% (95/80)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (66/54)
16% (95/15)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (66/12)
12% (121/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (83/8)